send a broken system backed by theoretical aspiration

SEND: A Broken System Backed by Theoretical Aspiration

Reading Time: 3 minutes

In 2011, the educational landscape received a transformative jolt with the introduction of the Special Education Green Paper by the Department for Education. This groundbreaking document aimed to address the marginalisation that certain individuals experienced within the educational realm. As we delve into this discourse, we explore the essence of this green paper’s aspirations, the evaluation of its realisation, and the potential avenues for overcoming its challenges.

The Aspirations: A Triad of Empowerment

The green paper’s fundamental objectives were threefold, each signifying a facet of empowerment:

  1. Tailored Provision for Individual Needs: The green paper sought to overturn the marginalization witnessed in previous legislative acts. By tailoring provisions to meet the distinct requirements of children and young individuals, the goal was to ensure an inclusive education landscape.
  2. Mitigating Adversarial Atmospheres: Adversarial tensions often surrounded the acquisition of provisions for those in need. The green paper envisioned a transformational shift to foster a collaborative spirit among stakeholders, thereby reducing adversarial conflicts.
  3. Empowering Traditionally Marginalized Communities: Traditionally disempowered communities of SEND service users were to be empowered, and the participation of children and parents was to be woven into the very fabric of decision-making processes.

The Reality: Aspirations and Challenges

A reflective evaluation of the present-day educational landscape reveals that while the green paper’s aspirations were indeed commendable, their consistent realization has remained elusive. In fact, recent changes in policy and practice have inadvertently deepened the preexisting challenges. Review of Education Bera

1. Dissatisfaction with the EHCP Process

A comprehensive review underscores a troubling reality: most service users express dissatisfaction with the EHCP (Education, Health, and Care Plan) process. What was intended to be a holistic solution has, for many, resulted in frustration and unmet expectations.

2. Limitations in Multi-Agency Collaboration

The green paper championed the significance of multi-agency collaboration for effective outcomes. However, this review reveals limitations in practice. Gaps in knowledge within health and social care services hinder seamless cooperation, and time pressures further strain professionals from different domains.

3. The Catalyst: A Glimmer of Change

Amid the challenges, a noteworthy initiative emerged. The tribunal’s service introduced a two-year pilot in 2018, allowing non-binding decisions on health and social care matters within the context of educational appeals. While this offers a glimmer of hope, it also highlights the potency of mechanisms for accountability.

4. The Disconnect: Lack of Clarity and Involvement

Both parents and professionals alike lament a lack of understanding of the EHCP process. This disconnect extends to the meaningful involvement of children and young individuals, often curtailed by age or perceived competency. Professionals, on the other hand, grapple with heightened demands and unrealistic parental expectations.

5. Cultural and Structural Barriers

Even as professionals strive to uplift children’s experiences, structural barriers persist. The unresolved issue of conflicts of policy looms large. While increased funding, time investment, and knowledge are vital, they must be accompanied by cultural shifts and enhanced accountability mechanisms.

Navigating Forward: Insights for a Holistic Approach

This review offers critical insights that can illuminate the path forward in navigating the complexities of the SEND system:

  1. Contextualising Individual Efforts: Empowering professionals to upskill and advocate for children is valuable, but it must be viewed within a larger context of systemic barriers.
  2. Cultural Transformation: Cultural change is indispensable. Funding alone cannot guarantee success; it must be accompanied by a cultural shift that aligns with the aspirations of children and families.
  3. Inclusive Research: Future research must explore nuanced differences in viewpoints among various professional groups, transcending the prevalent focus on SENCOs.

Conclusion: Paving the Way for a More Inclusive Future

As we conclude our exploration, it is evident that while the green paper’s ambitions remain aspirational, they offer a guiding light for transformation. A deeper understanding of challenges paves the way for comprehensive solutions, ensuring that the SEND system evolves into a beacon of empowerment and inclusivity.

Please add your thoughts

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Related Posts

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
Scroll to Top

Have a Question to Ask?

Enquiry Face to Face (1-to-1) Therapy

Enquiry Online (1-to-1) Therapy

A Popup thumb market just for decoration

Submit your Story to EHCPARENT Voices

Join Our Newsletter

Subscribe to receive our latest blog posts directly in your inbox!